Showing posts with label Wash Painting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wash Painting. Show all posts
1/22/12
Walnut v. India Ink
Walnut ink (left) and India ink (right) on bristol board; line work done using Hunt 107 nib; wash fills using nondescript #5 round sable brush; open in new window/tab for high-res. version
Molly was kind enough to give me a bottle of her hand-made walnut ink to test. Having worked with nothing but good ol' India ink and watercolor lampblack, I was excited by the prospect of trying something new.
This particular blend of walnut ink reminded me of coffee at first glance, and smelled rather strongly of alcohol, which I gather was added to prevent molding. Overall, said ink was visibly less viscous (it lacks additional binding agents) and nowhere near as light-fast, which made it less useful for hatching and fine line work. Fortunately, I had no trouble seeing what I was inking on the light table, and was on the whole pleasantly surprised by how easy it was to handle. It flowed effortlessly when used with both pen and brush, and was just as easy to clean.
Differences in opacity aside, the walnut ink I used also demonstrated some other curious characteristics. For instance, upon closer examination I noticed that it tended to pool at the edges of strokes (see detailed inset), leaving the center palpably lighter, though the effect was hardly unpleasant. Together with the ink's natural sepia tone and transparency, it lent the drawing a rather soft, low-contrast, somewhat nostalgic feel. When used in a wash, it bled less when applied to a pre-wetted surface, and barely needed diluting to achieve relatively high values and lighter mid-tones. Shadows are another story, and I suspect a more concentrated admixture will be required.
Alas, I won't be able to speak to its archival value for quite some time, though I'll venture to say that it's just as durable as India ink if properly stored. In the last analysis, I still prefer India ink for its opacity, contrast, and versatility, but odds are you'll see select illustrations rendered in walnut ink in the future.
5/24/11
Fun with Pen & Ink, Part II
India ink, wash, and opaque white ink on bristol board
You know what a caricature of Napoleon needs? A quick ink drawing of Sir Arthur Wellesley.
5/23/11
Fun with Pen & Ink
India ink & wash on bristol board
Trying out some new pen nibs I bought last week. Solid and wash fills aside, everything else was inked using a Hunt Imperial 101. The entire thing took two-and-a-half hours or so to complete; I chose Ingres' portrait of Napoleon because of the amount of detail/ornamentation.
5/15/11
The Progress of Memory
India ink on bristol board.
Illustrations for this month's issue of the Hypocrite Reader, which tackles issues pertaining to memory (and forgetting).
3/10/11
Dissidents & Demons
India ink & wash on bristol board
Some illustrations I pitched for the upcoming issue of the Hypocrite Reader, a quality online publication.
India ink & wash on bristol board
8/4/10
It's the Late 60s...
India ink & watercolors on bristol board
...and there's time to smoke. Informed by some lifestyle illustrations I found yesterday at Quimby's, an excellent bookstore near Wicker Park.
Also: Taking a break from animal illustrations--gotta do diverse things to keep the mind alive 'n' all.
5/16/10
Developments
Life is about to get very, very hectic owing to the convergence of some midterms, papers, and projects, so here's something (actually, a lot of things) to distract you until it blows over.
Designed in Adobe Illustrator CS3; Fonts: Romeral & Rockwell; 11" x 17"
I usually don't do figurative drawings in Illustrator because I find vectors too cumbersome for my usual illustrative style, which is more fluid. Some designs call for more precision, however, and I won't hesitate to turn to the program of record for those types of applications.




Designed in Adobe Illustrator CS3; Fonts: Romeral & Rockwell; 11" x 17"
It occurs to me that Archer would've complemented Romeral better than Rockwell, but I don't have a copy of the former, and would rather not shell out the $500 for a basic set.
Designed in Adobe Illustrator CS3; Fonts: Romeral & Rockwell; 11" x 17"
A breakdown of the guides and grid used to construct the stilt walker in the first poster.
India ink and watercolor lampblack wash on bristol board; colors added in Photoshop CS3
Speaking of more fluid illustrations, here's a colored rendition of my previous post, as well as the second part.
Part II:
When I was twenty-one
It was a very good year
It was a very good year
For city girls
Who lived up the stair
With all that perfumed hair
And it became undone
When I was twenty-one
4/29/10
It Was A Very Good Year (Part I)

India ink and watercolor lampblack wash on bristol board
When I was seventeenIt was a very good yearIt was a very good year for small town girlsAnd soft summer nightsWe'd hide from the lightsOn the village greenWhen I was seventeen
It Was A Very Good Year is a work of art, unlike this crummy picture I cobbled together. Honestly, the more I look at it, the less I like it.
Ugh.
Five billion brownie points to whoever lists everything that's wrong with this godawful creation.
4/24/10
Saturday Morning's for the Birds
India ink, watercolor lampblack wash, and color pencil on bristol board (vellum finish); clockwise from the top-left: Grey Heron, Little Grebe, Magnificent Frigatebird, Glossy Ibis, and Chinese Pond Heron
Woke up at 8:30 with nothing to do, so I drew some birds. I might try to brave the weather to shoot the thunderstorm later today/this afternoon seeing as how everyone else I know will be recovering from their respective hangovers and will therefore be indisposed. If inclement weather forces me to seek refuge indoors, then I can always attend to that personal project I mentioned yesterday/earlier this morning.
Crop from larger image--I don't have a proper scanner (HP no longer makes Vista-compatible drivers for the antediluvian one I own), so you'll just have to put up with the grey backgrounds
Friday Night Cartooning
India ink & watercolor lampblack wash on bristol board (260 gsm, vellum finish)
I was waiting for a 44" x 36" print at Midway when I started sketching owls for, well, no apparent reason whatsoever. Drawing animals isn't my wont, so I guess this is a decent crack at doing so. This is also my first time inking on vellum finish bristol board, which has a rougher surface texture than the variety that I've heretofore used. I thought the coarser finish would make inking with a dip pen difficult, but it actually turned out quite well. The additional 50 gsms' worth of weight also reduced warping. Guess I just found my new paper of choice.
4/17/10
Long Live Analog!
India ink, watercolor lampblack wash, and color pencil (!) on bristol board; minor color adjustments in Photoshop CS3
I bought a set of old-fashioned lettering pens and nibs a few days ago, and have been experimenting with them since. So far, the results are impressive: The pressure control of a two-dollar No. 55 student dip pen (yes, the kind you dip in inkwells) is simply peerless; Wacom's tablets are but pale (and expensive) imitations in comparison, at least when it comes to inking.
That said, the former is not without its drawbacks. Improper penmanship can easily result in unsightly ink blobs, excessive pen pressure can ruin the drawing surface, and India ink is a punishing medium in general. But I suppose that one indulges in analog illustration for the same reason one shoots film in this day and age: For the discipline it breeds and unmatched results it produces.
3/21/10
A Fine Afternoon Wasted on Wash Painting
Everything you need for wash painting: Green tea, salt, pepper, and powerful psychotropic drugs (not mine, I swear).
It occurs to me that some (read: all one) of you might be interested in how the terrible, worthless ideas in my head become commensurately terrible, worthless drawings. Contrary to popular belief, I do not simply abstract these irreverent (and irrelevant!) doodles from the luminiferous ether through sheer artistic will. Rather, I abide by an archaic, totally haphazard process, one that is guaranteed to (1) produce a finished cartoon and (2) erode the remaining shreds of my already withered sanity. Without further ado:
The setup is simple: An inclined drawing board, porcelain palette, two round sable brushes, one wide, flat-head brush, a tube of artists' watercolor lampblack, bottle of [purloined] India ink, some masking tape (not pictured), some 80 gsm printer paper (for roughs & test strips), 210 gsm bristol board (for the final product), two cups of water, some pencils, and an eraser. I'd have used a light table had I not left mine back in Hyde Park. The total cost of all that whatnot? About $200 at most, which is nothing compared to photo gear or a digital tablet (to say nothing of the associated software).
Every cartoon starts as an idea, plumbed from the dark depths of my morbid imagination, which I then translate into a rough doodle. "Roughs" can be very crude--the example you see above is considered very refined. Anyhow, I normally lay out various compositions in thumbnails first, but I skipped it this time because I had a pretty good idea of how I wanted the final product to look.
Now that I've an idea of where things should roughly fall, I render a graphite sketch so as to lock down additional details. Here, I made a separate pass with colored pencil to pick out the figures that I want to include in the final. This step tends to get messy, but is necessary. Some cartoons require two or three sketches before inking.
I also used this opportunity to do a quick value-map for the final wash, which you can see in the thumbnail in the upper-right.
Before I start inking, I do a preliminary wash pass to determine what values should appear in the final painting. It also provides me with an approximation of what things will look like on bristol board.
Once that's done, I start transferring the sketch from step two onto bristol board. Ordinarily, I use a light table, which allows me to simply trace the sketch. Here, I had to eyeball everything, using a mechanical pencil for lighter marks that I can easily erase. In any event, this is when I lay down the lowest values (i.e. black fills), and is by far the most frustrating yet rewarding step, largely owing to the amount of detail work I have to do.
Inking's very, very important: Line thickness communicates weight, volume, and linear flow, and any SNAFU with India ink means starting over (I don't use correction liquid, which tends to look weird).
Using the wash prepared in step three, I begin to "build" values, tier by tier, starting from the highest (hightlights short of white) down to the lowest (shadows short of black). This step tends to be considerably less nerve-wracking than inking, as wash is relatively easy to control if you're not doing fine gradients. Bristol board is preferred over lighter/less dense watercolor paper because it (1) warps less, (2) is smooth enough to allow the wash to travel unimpeded across its surface, and (3) has excellent absorbency properties.
Scanning is always more cost-effective than using a digital camera (unless you're shooting with some sort of insane macro setup), but I had to use my D90 for want of a proper scanner. I decreased the weight of the employer stand-in's left eye so as to emphasize his surprise/shock. The entire process took about, oh, two hours at most, from conception to finish. THE END.
2/28/10
The Carp-ocalypse: Part II
Personally, I'm not happy with (1) the overabundance of copy and (2) my treatment of the type. I shouldn't have rotated so many glyphs' axes, and there's some funny kerning, especially in the title.
Still, I think that the poster turned out well overall; those of you at the University should be seeing some variation of this on campus soon.
Addendum:
It occurs to me that I spelled "bottled" incorrectly.
2/21/10
It's the Carp-ocalypse!
Graphite, India ink, watercolor lampblack wash, and a touch of correction fluid on bristol board
A potential illustration for a University client who wanted a t-shirt design about the Asian carp infestation. The only aesthetic stipulation was that it resemble vintage 50s/60s lobby cards, which informed the use of ink & wash. I will add color and copy in Photoshop an Illustrator down the proverbial road.
2/8/10
Adventures in the Land of Analog Art
Lo, 't is our perennial good fellow, Eustace Tilley, rendered in ink, an actual, physical medium! It's a shame that the artist--some hopeless amateur, no doubt--neglected to tape down the paper before applying the wash. The artist of record sincerely apologizes for the warping and distorted surfaces produced by his idiocy. He will now proceed to comically hurl himself off of a conveniently placed cliff.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








